MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785925259

The Feminists are Coming: A Critical Analysis of Melisandre and Feminism in Game of Thrones

2018· article· en· W2785925259 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hattie McKay

Bibliographic record

VenueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismGame studiesSociologyGender studiesCritical discourse analysisMedia studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsIdeologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When it comes to platforms for people to express their opinions, the internet is a magical place. These opinions become present when people are talking about things they are passionate about, such as popular culture. One popular culture outlet that attracts internet chatter is the HBO television show Game of Thrones. The internet users become especially passionate about Game of Thrones when the topic of feminism is discussed. BuzzFeed articles such as “9 Ways ‘Game of Thrones’ Is Actually Feminist” are found along side Huffington Post articles titled, “My Feminist Opinions Ruined ‘Game of Thrones’ for My Boyfriend.” These two opposing views found side by side give us a clue to the relationship between feminism and Game of Thrones, and that clue is: it’s complicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)Same topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207