MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785943151 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.6645

1. Analyse de l’évolution des données sur la criminalité, les tribunaux criminels et les services correctionnels au Québec de 1962 à 2008

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2785943151 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marc Ouimet

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La criminalité, définie comme l’ensemble des infractions constatées au Code criminel ainsi qu’à des lois fédérales connexes, est un objet de recherche sociologique important. Bien que l’analyse des tendances de la criminalité ait une longue histoire en criminologie, il y a eu très peu de travaux réalisés au Canada avant les années 1970. On trouve quelques études sur des phénomènes criminels particuliers (sur les jeunes délinquants, les tribunaux, les populations correctionnelles). La seule ét...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207