MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785950534 · doi:10.1109/epec.2017.8286201

Parameter validation for Kalman filter based dynamic state estimation of power plant dynamics

2017· article· en· W2785950534 on OpenAlexaff
Avishek Paul, G. Joós, Innocent Kamwa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterPhasor measurement unitControl theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterParametric statisticsPhasorBenchmark (surveying)Invariant extended Kalman filterComputer scienceFast Kalman filterMonte Carlo methodAlpha beta filterEnsemble Kalman filterUnscented transformElectric power systemEngineeringPower (physics)MathematicsStatisticsMoving horizon estimationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of effect of parametric variability on dynamic state estimates of synchronous generator operating using terminal Phasor Measurement Unit has been conducted. Parametric variations have been modelled using Monte Carlo method and state deviation from actual ones has been presented using suitable metrics. In addition impact of individual parametric variations on all the states have been studied as well. Furthermore, two Kalman filter variants (Extended Kalman Filter with unknown inputs and Unscented Kalman Filter) has been considered to ascertain whether choice of Kalman filter affects state estimates when subjected to parametric variability. Initial results have been performed on a Single Machine Infinite Bus (SMIB) system and consistency of the results has been validated on an interconnected network using the benchmark IEEE 39 bus system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207