Posextractivismo: del discurso a la práctica—Reflexiones para la acción
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El pensamiento dominante nos conduce a aceptar como imposible una economía sin crecimiento. La única vía para lograr el desarrollo pasaría por el crecimiento económico. Esto demanda cada vez mayores volúmenes de recursos naturales que sostengan la creciente demanda mundial. Al mismo tiempo ese esfuerzo aseguraría los ingresos para que el Sur global supere su «subdesarrollo». La realidad, sin embargo, nos dice que superar esas visiones es la gran tarea del momento. El resto demanda superar «la religión del crecimiento económico», dando paso a respuestas que nos saquen también de la trampa del extractivismo. Y, por cierto, también debemos transitar hacia una sociedad no capitalista, que puede inspirarse en las visiones, valores, experiencias y prácticas de las diversas formas de «Buen Vivir» de los diversos pueblos indígenas del planeta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.080 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".