MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786056481 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2017.8274245

Damped high passive filter — a new filtering scheme for multipulse rectifier systems

2017· article· en· W2786056481 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Li, Wilsun Xu, Tianyu Ding

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicFilter (signal processing)Filter designElectronic filterLow-pass filterHigh-pass filterElectronic engineeringRectifier (neural networks)Prototype filterComputer scienceElectrical impedanceVoltage-controlled filterMechanical filterm-derived filterHarmonic analysisActive filterControl theory (sociology)EngineeringAcousticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multipulse rectifier systems are commonly used to reduce harmonic emission. However, they still require the installation of non-characteristic harmonic filters to prevent harmful resonance between its high-pass filter and the system impedance. The advantage of a multipulse configuration - very low non-characteristic harmonic emission - is, therefore, not fully utilized. In view of this shortcoming, a novel filter called damped high-pass (DHP) filter is proposed. The filter does not cause resonance at the non-characteristic harmonic frequencies. As a result, traditional non-characteristic 5th and 7th harmonic filters are no longer needed, resulting in significant cost and space savings for the multipulse systems. The core idea behind this filter is a frequency-dependent resistor block that provides high damping at the non-characteristic harmonic frequencies. Design procedure for the proposed filter is presented. Performance and usefulness of the new filtering scheme has been demonstrated through comparative studies on two actual industry cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207