The Intensity of Recollection-Images in Suspicious River and The Law of Enclosures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a long tradition of film scholarship dealing with the representation of time in cinema, generally focusing on the techniques that signify more or less explicitly temporal shifts in the unfolding of the narrative.Some of these critical approaches to the representation of time are useful in untangling the sometimes extremely complex imbrications of past, present, and future displayed in contemporary films where causality and chronology can prove ostentatiously deconstructed.However, few film scholars have paid attention to films that conceal temporal layering behind the guise of mundane realism.Seemingly simple films such as Lynne Stopkewich's Suspicious River (2000) and John Greyson's Law of Enclosures (2000) appear on the surface to be concerned only with the day-to-day existence of ordinary people living in "ordinary times".However, upon closer inspection, these Canadian productions construct an experience of time that is far more ambivalent than initially assumed.This dissertation intends to develop an analytical model for such films based on some aspects of Henri Bergson's philosophy of time.Using this Bergsonian lens, I intend to show how virtually imperceptible juxtapositions of temporal frames are used in these films to evoke the simultaneous experience of past and present.Focusing primarily on Suspicious River and The Law of Enclosures, this dissertation examines how representations of memory and the act of remembrance evoke Bergson's theory that events run into each other without specific points of transition.Consequently, recollection is not treated as a means by which to understand the present, but as a fluid layering of time that resists symbolic, linear, and quantitative progression.The past is not treated as a means to determine the destiny of the lead character; the past is not reduced to a representation of what is logically antecedent to the present; rather, it has been actualized horizontally in present-time.In short, the multilayered experience of time in films such as Suspicious River and Law of Enclosures reflects how the subject submerges her experience of the present into a virtual past, wherein her memories coexist with and extend into the present.Ultimately, this might have something to do with what Peter Harcourt once identified as a quintessential feature of Canadian cinema: "suspended judgment."It is an attitude whereby Canadian film characters remain thoughtfully detached and disengaged from the urgency of timely reactions and consequently resist falling prey to the controlled temporal structure of instrumentalist consumerism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".