MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W278611227

Shakespeare and the Gothic Strain

2010· article· en· W278611227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Charnes

Bibliographic record

VenueShakespeare studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteratureRomanceDramaVampireHAMLET (protein complex)ArtHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IT MAY NOT SEEM IMMEDIATELY OBVIOUS that Shakespearean drama and literature should share scholarly space. Shakespeare represents apex of literary culture, while there is still a whiff of something slightly disreputable or pulpy about texts. They are, however, deeply intertwined, and this review essay will explore some of implications of that interlocutorship through an expanded review of recent anthology Shakespeares, edited by John Drakakis and Dale Townshend (2008). I make no claims to be an expert on nineteenth-century fiction, but I am a longtime fan of texts and herewith offer some further reflections on topic that, hopefully, will add to and complicate conversation fruitfully begun Shakespeares. For many years, literary studies at least, term has been associated primarily with early nineteenth-century novel and particularly with romance or even ladies' novels. A hybrid of fairy-tale elements, ghost stories, sagas of families fallen into disrepute and disrepair (madwomen attics, angry poor relations, and debauched former aristocrats), novel developed a trajectory separate from, but parallel to, more canonically respectable later Victorian novel. The novel's baptism England is often (arguably, as we will see) attributed to Horace Walpole's The Castle of Otranto: A Story (1765); its successive tradition has ventured into terrain as sophisticated as novels of Edith Wharton and Henry James. Consequently term is now a magician's hat out of which many rabbits may be pulled. (1) It has been applied to films as well as literary texts, ranging from Murnan's Nosferatu to Ridley Scott's Alien and Blade Runner, from classics such as The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari to recent (Japanese-inspired) horror films such as The Grudge or Dark Water; from melodramatic musicals (Andrew Lloyd Weber's Phantom of Opera) to noir detective stories; and, of course, to recent explosion of vampire novels, films, and television serials. To avoid wandering, Melmoth-like, through 150 years during which literature has developed, I will concentrate on some key thematics that link these genres, a thread that often includes one or more of following: a shameful secret of some sort, often intergenerational; an enemy (external or internal) whose outlines are blurry or vague; and a dwelling or location decay--often an old family estate or even a geographic region, as with HBO's recent Southern vampire serial True Blood, set post-Katrina Louisiana. Whereas many genres, including science fiction, involve enemy or alien invasions, invokes its own special brand of dread: of something or someone already in house as it were (or under stage, or ground, or lake, or floorboards), issuing audible but indecipherable demands. Aside from Hamlet, Macbeth, and Richard III, few of Shakespeare's plays seem especially proto-Gothic. However, Shakespeares brings together a group of British, American and Canadian scholars who attempt to define the Gothic conceptual, aesthetic, historical, and generic terms, and collectively to argue that Shakespeare is not only himself but a cause that is others. Speaking to elasticity of term his introduction, John Drakakis points out that even at most superficial level, a predilection for spectres, graveyards, paraphernalia of death, as well as the emphasis on 'non-rational' as a category of human experience, renders Shakespeare's plays to descriptive term (1). There is, I would add, a difference between rendering Shakespeare open to charge, and delineating what is singularly as a genre or aesthetic category. After all, an investment resources of supernatural (ibid.) has been a literary feature since dawn of storytelling and does not alone define Gothic. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShakespeare studiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207