MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786124958 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292538

Cooperative sensing delay minimization in cloud-assisted DSA networks

2017· article· en· W2786124958 on OpenAlexaff
Shree Krishna Sharma, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkMinificationChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingDuty cycleReal-time computingThroughputData centerWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) is considered as a promising solution to address the problem of spectrum scarcity in future wireless networks. However, the main challenges associated with this approach are to acquire accurate spectrum usage information in a timely manner and to deal with the dynamicity of channel occupancy. Although Cooperative Sensing (CS) can provide significant advantages over individual device-level sensing in terms of sensing efficiency and the achievable throughput, the acquired channel occupancy information may become outdated in dynamic channel conditions due to the involved latency. In this regard, we propose to utilize a collaborative cloud-edge processing framework to minimize the CS delay in DSA networks. In this framework, the cloud-center can estimate channel occupancy parameters such as duty cycle based on the available historical sensing data by using a suitable spectrum prediction technique, and subsequently this prior knowledge can be utilized to adapt the sensing mechanism employed at the edge-side of a DSA network. Motivated by this, we formulate and solve the problem of minimizing CS delay in cloud-assisted DSA networks. A two-stage bisection search method is employed to solve this CS delay minimization problem. Our results show that the proposed cloud-assisted CS scheme can significantly reduce the CS delay in DSA networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207