MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786300917 · doi:10.1109/ascc.2017.8287620

Setpoint control for reacting to wastewater influent in BSM1

2017· article· en· W2786300917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetpointWastewaterEnvironmental scienceControl (management)Sewage treatmentControl theory (sociology)Environmental engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method for designing and tracking an optimal set point for a biological wastewater treatment, where the set point changes in real time in order to respond to changing influent disturbance. The objectives are to minimize energy consumption even while meeting or exceeding effluent quality standards, even during extreme weather events. The proposed method trains neural networks to estimate NARX models of the system. A nonlinear optimization then predicts an optimal set point, which is used as a search direction for finding the true optimal set point. The BSM1 simulation model provides a benchmark for testing the design. For tracking the set point, the standard PI controls found with BSM1 are replaced by adaptive controls, with an additional feedback loop not found in the original BSM1. Simulation results show that the proposed method improves both effluent quality and reduces energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207