MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786345324 · doi:10.22230/src.2018v9n1a286

Historical Studies in Education/Revue d’histoire de l’éducation - A Journal's Journey From Past to Present

2018· article· en· W2786345324 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Penney Clark, Mona Gleason, Katie Gemmell

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly and Research Communication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeniorityLibrary scienceEthnic groupRace (biology)HistoryPolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesSocial scienceGender studiesAnthropologyArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historical Studies in Education/Revue d’histoire de l’éducation is the peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian History of Education Association/ Association canadienne d’histoire de l’éducation. This bilingual, online, open-access journal is now in its 29th year of publication and appears twice yearly. In addition to scholarly articles, it publishes research notes, book reviews, and a biennial bibliography of publications on the history of education. Authors represent a full range of constituencies in terms of gender, race/ethnicity, age, research interests, and seniority within the field of history of education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.334
GPT teacher head0.513
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly and Research CommunicationSame topicHistorical Education Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207