Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte porte sur une expérience de plus de trente-cinq ans en tant que psychologue en cabinet privé. Mon regard est ici dirigé vers des personnes ayant manifesté, en clinique, le désir de se tuer. Je relate aussi le cas d’un patient qui a réalisé un passage à l’acte. J’y témoigne d’une série de vécus différents autour de l’idéation suicidaire, du suicide et de la mort. J’insiste sur la nécessité, en psychothérapie, d’entrevoir ce lieu comme étant un espace privilégié pour aborder, en profondeur, les intentions de se donner la mort d’une personne en grande souffrance. Je pense être capable d’affirmer que la communication de sa souffrance est l’élément-clé d’une possible compréhension de celle-ci. Bien que l’on puisse faire certains recoupements entre les personnes qui disent vouloir se tuer ou d’autres qui posent le geste, on ne peut généraliser car nous sommes tous des cas d’exception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".