Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) is an emerging technology of non-volatile memory (NVM). Although the observation of metal oxide that can undergo an abrupt insulator-metal transition into a conductive state has been known for over 40 years, researchers started investigating those materials for memory applications in late 1990s. It has been considered as the next generation memory technology to replace current flash memory because RRAM has demonstrated feasible switching characteristics and potential to build high density arrays and also RRAM is also compatible with contemporary CMOS processes, which means RRAM can be integrated into current CMOS chips. While the structure of RRAM is a simple metal-insulator-metal (MIM) device, there are numerous materials that exhibit resistive switching. The switching behavior is not only dependent on the switching layer materials but also dependent on the choice of metal electrodes and their interfacial properties. Many metal oxides such as hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, nickel oxide (NiO), tantalum oxide and etc. have been studied in details; however, some materials are unexplored such as cerium oxide. In addition to nonvolatile storage applications, RRAM is considered as one of essential elements for advancing neuromorphic computing because of its analog switching and retention characteristics. This thesis investigated CeO[subscript x]-based RRAMs, from its fundamental device characteristics to neuromorphic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".