MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786459959 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0039

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF AN AKF BASED TIGHTLY-COUPLED INS/GNSS INTEGRATED SCHEME WITH NHC FOR LAND VEHICULAR APPLICATIONS

2013· article· en· W2786459959 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kun-Yao Peng, Cheng-An Lin, Kai‐Wei Chiang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceA priori and a posterioriExtended Kalman filterKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunicationsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INS/GNSS integrated scheme can overcome the shortcoming of INS or GNSS alone to provide superior performance. AKF is based on the maximum likelihood criterion for choosing appropriate weight and thus to adjust factors online. The primary advantage of AKF is that the filter has less relationship with priori statistical information. There are two NHC available for land navigation which the velocity of vehicle in the plane perpendicular to the forward direction is zero. To validate the performance of proposed scheme, the preliminary results illustrated AKF based tightly-coupled INS/GNSS integrated scheme can provide more stable solutions combined with NHC during GNSS outages. Generally speaking, the improvement ratio of 3D positioning reach 40% compared to EKF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207