Determination of Iron in Vegetable Oil by Fourier Transform Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflection (FTIR-ATR) for the quantification of iron (Fe) in vegetable oil extracted from the fruit of the moriche palm (buriti) [Mauritia flexuosa] was evaluated. This green method enables direct measurements without previous sample handling. Twenty-five buriti samples were collected in Roraima (Brazil). The statistical models were developed using the technique of partial least squares (PLS) analysis and the data set was divided into two parts: one used for calibration (n = 20) and one used for testing (n = 5). First, the model was calibrated and cross-validated with the calibration data set so that the model was validated with the test data set to verify its prediction ability. To obtain reference data, the samples were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF). The coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.9965 and the mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) obtained for iron (Fe) was 0.8067 (in ppm). The results showed that the prediction ability can be considered good for large quantification of iron intervals in vegetable oil, and the mean relative errors were less than ±7%. This indicated that the green method for the determination of iron (Fe) in vegetable oil by Fourier transform mid-infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflection can be used as an alternative method to the classic methods of analysis, because it does not use reagents harmful to the environment or operator, does not generate harmful waste, uses a fast technique, and there is minimal manipulation of the sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".