MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786634922 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.873.873

Novel Insights into the Clinical Phenotype and Pathophysiology Underlying Low VWF Levels: The Low Von Willebrand Factor in Ireland Cohort (LoVIC) Study

2016· article· en· W2786634922 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle Lavin, Sonia Águila, Sonja Schneppenheim, Niall Dalton, Jamie M. O’Sullivan, Niamh O’Connell, Kevin Ryan, Mary Byrne, Margaret Nolan, Roger J. S. Preston, Ulrich Budde, Paula James, Jorge Di Paola, James S. O’Donnell

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVon Willebrand factorVon Willebrand diseaseMedicineCohortInternal medicineProspective cohort studyGastroenterologyCohort studyImmunologyPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cohort studies have identified VWF gene mutations in ~65% of patients with type 1 Von Willebrand Disease (VWD). However, in patients with mild reductions in Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels, VWF mutations are less common and linkage studies suggest that the reduced plasma VWF levels are often independent of the VWFgene. Important clinical questions therefore remain unanswered regarding diagnosis and management of patients with Low VWF (levels 30-50 IU/dL). Evidence-based diagnostic criteria are needed for establishing the diagnosis of Low VWF, and the relationship between Low VWF levels and bleeding phenotype needs to be defined. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the reduced plasma VWF levels remain unclear. To address these questions, we established the Low VWF Ireland Cohort (LoVIC) study. In contrast to previous Type 1 VWD studies, this prospective longitudinal cohort study recruited only patients with Low VWF levels, (defined by bleeding history and lowest VWF levels 30-50 IU/dL on two occasions, three months apart) and recruited 140 adult Irish patients. Although Bleeding Assessment Tools (BATs) have been used in type 1 VWD, their utility has not been studied in patients with Low VWF. As determined using either the ISTH BAT or the Condensed MCMDM-1 VWD score, we observed significant bleeding histories in the majority of LoVIC patients. For example, among female patients (n=112), 77% had positive ISTH BAT scores (≥6) and 72% had positive MCMDM-1 scores (≥4). Importantly, bleeding tendency did not correlate with plasma VWF levels within the 30-50 IU/dL range. To further investigate this bleeding phenotype, hemostatic studies (including platelet aggregation and coagulation factor assays) were performed. Additional mild coagulation defects were identified in only 10 subjects. Furthermore, abnormal multimer patterns were identified in only 3 patients. To investigate the pathophysiology underlying Low VWF levels, plasma FVIII:C and VWF propeptide (VWF:pp) levels were defined. Interestingly, plasma FVIII:C/VWF:Ag ratios were significantly increased in LoVIC patients compared to normal controls (mean 1.3 versus 1.07; p<0.001). In contrast, increased plasma VWF:pp/VWF:Ag ratios > 3 were observed in only 6% of the total cohort. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the reduced plasma VWF levels in patients with Low VWF are predominantly attributable to decreased VWF synthesis and/or secretion rather than enhanced VWF clearance. To determine whether quantitative and/or qualitative abnormalities in platelet (plt)-VWF may influence bleeding phenotype in patients with Low VWF, we studied plt-VWF:Ag and VWF:CB in 50 consecutive LoVIC patients. In keeping with the hypothesis that reduced VWF synthesis plays a key role in the pathogenesis underlying Low VWF levels, plt-VWF:Ag and plt-VWF:CB levels were both significantly reduced in LoVIC patients compared to controls (mean plt-VWF:Ag 0.16 versus 0.21 IU/109/L, p<0.05; mean plt-VWF:CB 0.18 versus 0.34 IU/109/L, p<0.001). To further study the molecular mechanisms underlying Low VWF levels, plasma VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo responses following desmopressin (DDAVP) administration were examined. In 88% of patients, the post-DDAVP peak levels exceeded 100 IU/dL. Importantly, the response to DDAVP was also sustained with both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo above 100 IU/dL after 4 hours in 72% subjects. These DDAVP responses demonstrate that Weibel Palade body stores of VWF are maintained in patients with Low VWF, and that the regulated pathway of VWF secretion is intact. Furthermore, the sustained plasma VWF response observed following DDAVP supports the hypothesis that enhanced VWF clearance does not play a major role in the pathogenesis of Low VWF levels. In conclusion, we demonstrate that Low VWF levels are associated with a significant bleeding phenotype. In addition, we further show that in the majority of patients with Low VWF levels, the bleeding phenotype cannot be explained by the presence of concomitant bleeding disorders. Finally, our novel data demonstrate that Low VWF levels are due in large part to reductions in VWF synthesis and/or constitutive secretion. Although enhanced VWF clearance may contribute to the pathophysiology in a minority of individuals with Low VWF, the absolute reduction in VWF plasma half-life is usually mild and not sufficient to significantly impact upon the duration of DDAVP-induced VWF response. Disclosures Lavin: Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding. O'Sullivan:Pzifer: Research Funding. O'Connell:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding. James:Octapharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Basalt: Consultancy. Di Paola:CSL BEhring: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy. O'Donnell:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207