MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786649087 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2017.8288144

Energy Efficient Packet Transmission Strategies for Wireless Body Area Networks with Rechargeable Sensors

2017· article· en· W2786649087 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Zhao, Shiwei Huang, Jun Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetQueueing theoryMarkov chainTransmission (telecommunications)Markov processChannel (broadcasting)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Computer networkWirelessWireless sensor networkProvisioningMaximizationBody area networkMathematical optimizationReal-time computingDistributed computingTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate energy efficient packet transmission strategies for wireless body area networks (WBANs) with rechargeable sensors. For practical implementations, we propose a multi-threshold based transmission strategy by taking into account the channel state, battery state and number of buffered packets in the system. A discrete Markov arrival process (DMAP) is introduced to jointly model channel correlations and energy allocations. After that, with given thresholds and corresponding energy allocations, a level dependent Quasi-Birth- and-Death Markov chain is constructed to evaluate the system performance. According to the derived performance metrics, we formulate an optimization problem to find optimal thresholds for energy efficiency maximization with reasonable performance provisioning. Extensive simulations are conducted to verify our proposed queueing analytical model and demonstrate perfor- mance gains of our proposed strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207