MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786670643 · doi:10.1109/icemis.2017.8272993

Probabilistic day-ahead load forecast using quantile regression forests

2017· article· en· W2786670643 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Lahouar, Amal Mejri, Jaleleddine Ben Hadj Slama

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantile regressionProbabilistic logicQuantileProbabilistic forecastingPrediction intervalComputer scienceRandom forestEconometricsStatisticsRegressionMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Load forecast is one of the most important tasks in modern and smart grids. With the integration of renewable intermittent sources and the adoption of demand response strategies, an accurate short-term prediction becomes mandatory. Modern forecast approaches do not merely estimate future values, but provide also confidence intervals with different widths and probabilities. Therefore, this paper proposes a probabilistic day-ahead load forecast approach based on quantile regression forests. Quantile regression forests are extensions to random forests that provide confidence intervals instead of single points. The forecaster inputs are chosen according to measures of correlation and importance, profile analysis and wavelet decomposition of load curves. Several tests are performed using real data sets from the Ontario market. The results reflect the accuracy and the effectiveness of the proposed model under different circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207