Zouttolerantie aardappelen SWAP-WOFOST toepassing op Zilt Proefbedrijf Texel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Op het Zilt Proefbedrijf Texel ‘SaltFarm Texel’ (www.SaltFarmTexel.com) worden proeven uitgevoerd om voor verschillende landbouwgewassen de zouttolerantie te onderzoeken. Gedurende de periode 2012 tot en met 2015 zijn onder gecontroleerde veldomstandigheden de zouttolerantie van de aardappelvariëteiten Miss Mignonne en Achilles vastgesteld (De Vos et al., 2016). In dit rapport wordt beschreven in hoeverre het model SWAP-WOFOST (Kroes et al., 2009) de meetgegevens van het Zilt Proefbedrijf Texel kan simuleren. In het laatste hoofdstuk wordt beknopt beschreven hoe met deze kennis metarelaties kunnen worden afgeleid voor het bepalen van de langjarig gemiddelde opbrengstderving als gevolg van zout schade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it