MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786725920 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2017-0167

Temporal and spatial evolution of Northern Cascade Arc magmatism revealed by LA–ICP–MS U–Pb zircon dating

2018· article· en· W2786725920 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Emily K. Mullen, Jean‐Louis Paquette, Jeffrey H. Tepper, I. S. McCallum

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsBatholithGeologyMagmatismZirconPlutonGeochemistryCalderaVolcanoPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present thirty new laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry U–Pb zircon dates for intermediate to silicic plutons of the Northern Cascade Arc with emphasis on the Chilliwack batholith – Mount Baker magmatic focus, located in southwestern British Columbia and northern Washington. Chilliwack magmatism commenced at ∼35 Ma in southwestern British Columbia and the most voluminous plutons define a cluster at ∼32–29 Ma, documenting an early flare-up. During the same interval, the Index, Squire Creek, and Cascade Pass intrusions were emplaced south of the Chilliwack batholith. North of the Chilliwack, maximum pluton ages become progressively younger northward, tracking the northerly migration of the edge of the Farallon–Juan de Fuca–Explorer plate system relative to North America. Chilliwack magmatism continued from ∼29 Ma to 22 Ma at a slightly reduced flux, followed by a lull from 22 to 11 Ma during which magmatism shifted north to the Mount Barr batholith (18 Ma). Chilliwack magmatism resumed by 11 Ma but was intermittent and the intrusive flux was significantly lower. The temporal decrease in intrusive flux displayed by the Chilliwack batholith correlates with the declining convergence rate of the Juan de Fuca plate since arc inception. The 11 Ma-to-present magmatism extends a pattern of southwesterly migration of the magmatic focus previously identified from ∼4 Ma (Hannegan caldera) to the modern Mount Baker volcanic field. Crustal rotation accounts for the rate of the first ∼7 million years of migration. However, the migration rate more than doubled at ∼4 Ma, coinciding with separation of the Explorer plate and initiation of Juan de Fuca plate rollback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207