MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786788979 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732407

A Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE)

2018· article· en· W2786788979 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. Boselli, Matteo Fossati, Laura Ferrarese, S. Boissier, G. Consolandi, A. Longobardi, P. Amram, Michael L. Balogh, P. Barmby, M. Boquien, F. Boulanger, J. Braine, V. Buat, D. Burgarella, F. Combes, T. Contini, L. Cortese, Patrick Côté, S. Côté, Jean‐Charles Cuillandre, Laurent Drissen, B. Epinat, Michele Fumagalli, S. C. Gallagher, G. Gavazzi, J. A. Gómez-López, Stephen Gwyn, William E. Harris, G. Hensler, B. Koribalski, M. Marcelin, Alan W. McConnachie, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, Julio F. Navarro, David R. Patton, Eric W. Peng, H. Plana, Nikos Prantzos, Carmelle Robert, Joel Roediger, Y. Roehlly, D. Russeil, P. Salomé, Rubén Sánchez-Janssen, P. Serra, Kristine Spekkens, Ming Sun, James E. Taylor, Stephanie Tonnesen, B. Vollmer, J. P. Willis, H. Wozniak, Todd Burdullis, D. Devost, Billy Mahoney, N. Manset, Andreea Petric, S. Prunet, Kanoa Withington

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaTrent UniversityUniversity of VictoriaUniversité LavalWestern UniversityQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of WaterlooHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJet Propulsion LaboratoryCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinisterio de Educación, Gobierno de ChileCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVirgo ClusterPhysicsGalaxyAstrophysicsTelescopeStar formationAstronomyGalaxy cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE) is a blind narrow-band (NB) Hα +[NII] imaging survey carried out with MegaCam at the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope. The survey covers the whole Virgo cluster region from its core to one virial radius (104 deg 2 ). The sensitivity of the survey is of f ( Hα ) ~ 4 × 10 −17 erg s −1 cm −2 (5 σ detection limit) for point sources and Σ( Hα ) ~ 2 × 10 −18 erg s −1 cm −2 arcsec −2 (1 σ detection limit at 3 arcsec resolution) for extended sources, making VESTIGE the deepest and largest blind NB survey of a nearby cluster. This paper presents the survey in all its technical aspects, including the survey design, the observing strategy, the achieved sensitivity in both the NB Hα +[NII] and in the broad-band r filter used for the stellar continuum subtraction, the data reduction, calibration, and products, as well as its status after the first observing semester. We briefly describe the Hα properties of galaxies located in a 4 × 1 deg 2 strip in the core of the cluster north of M87, where several extended tails of ionised gas are detected. This paper also lists the main scientific motivations for VESTIGE, which include the study of the effects of the environment on galaxy evolution, the fate of the stripped gas in cluster objects, the star formation process in nearby galaxies of different type and stellar mass, the determination of the Hα luminosity function and of the Hα scaling relations down to ~10 6 M ⊙ stellar mass objects, and the reconstruction of the dynamical structure of the Virgo cluster. This unique set of data will also be used to study the HII luminosity function in hundreds of galaxies, the diffuse Hα +[NII] emission of the Milky Way at high Galactic latitude, and the properties of emission line galaxies at high redshift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations125
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207