Perception étudiante de la commande d’écriture de mémoires et rapport à l’écriture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le rapport à l’écriture d’étudiants est analysé à partir de la perception que ces derniers ont de la commande d’écriture des mémoires – professionnels ou de recherche – nécessaires pour valider leur diplôme. Notre recherche a été menée auprès d’étudiants, de formateurs et de responsables dans trois filières de formation dont deux combinent un diplôme professionnel et un diplôme universitaire. Le dispositif socio-clinique institutionnel a permis de mener la recherche transversalement à ces différentes formations et d’associer les sujets de la recherche à la production des analyses. Trois postures ont été identifiées pour décrire les rapports des étudiants à la commande d’écriture du mémoire: «écrire un mémoire comme un exercice à faire», «faire une recherche» et «se construire intellectuellement et professionnellement».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".