MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2787035112 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v10n3p90

Community-Based Maternal and Neonatal Health Services in Kolda and Sedhiou Districts of Senegal

2018· article· en· W2787035112 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alioune Badara Tall, Adama Faye, Abdoul Aziz Ndiaye, Boubacar Guèye, Ndèye Fatou Ngom, Anta Agne, Papa Gallo Sow, Martial Coly Bop, Ousseynou Kâ, Anta Tal‐Dia

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicineHealth facilityEnvironmental healthReproductive healthBirth attendantSituation analysisCommunity healthInfant mortalityPostnatal CareChristian ministryDeveloping countryDemographyNursingPregnancyPublic healthMaternal healthHealth servicesPopulationPediatricsEconomic growthBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: A recent assessment of the Millennium Development Goals has shown significant gaps in most developing countries, particularly with regard to the decline in maternal and infant mortality. Unaccess to health services is a major obstacle to reducing maternal and infant mortality. To support the Ministry of Health and Social Action in the implementation of its Strategic Plan for Reproductive Health (2012-2015), the NGO Micronutriment Initiative has developed a project based on Community-based Maternal and Neonatal Health services (CBMNH), which will be implemented at the level of the Kolda region. The general objective of this study is to carry out a situational analysis of maternal and neonatal health in the health districts of Kolda and Sedhiou to help the implementation and the evaluation of the project.METHOD: It was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional survey. The study included women who gave birth between February 2013 and January 2014. The sampling was random at two degrees. The sample size was 471 women for each of the two health districts. The data collected during an individual interview focused on prenatal consultation (PNC), delivery, postnatal consultation (PONC) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). The quantitative analysis of the data consisted of the estimation of the main indicators, the comparison of the indicators between the health district of Sedhiou and the health intervention district of Kolda. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with PNC, delivery, and EBF.RESULTS: In total, 965 women were interviewed. The results of the study show that the average duration of PNC1 ranged from 3.41 months in Sedhiou to 3.82 months in Kolda. The proportion of women with full PNC was 38.8% and 54.9% respectively in Kolda and Sedhiou. The proportion of women who took iron-folic acid for at least 90 days ranged from 78.8% (Sédhiou) to 71.7% (Kolda). The delivery was carried out by trained staff in 61.0% and 57.4% respectively in Kolda and Sedhiou. The EBF was initiated in the first hour in 47.0% (Kolda) and 52.6% (Sédhiou). The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the early use of PNC services was related to low household income (0.65 [0.50-0.86]), proximity to the health facility (1.93 [1.34-2.78]) and multiparity (1.4 [1.05-1.87]). Completion of all PNC was associated with household income and early PNC1 (3.65 [2.58-5.18]). With regard to iron-folic acid intake, it was more common in women who achieved early PNC1 (2.19 [1.58-3.04]) and all PNC (3.58 [2.22- 5.77]). The delivery by trained personnel was related to the proximity of the structure (2.43 [1.75-3.37]), but also to the preparation of the delivery. Women who knew the period of the MBF (1.37 [1.04-1.81]) and the protective role of the EBF (1.71 [1.28-2.27]) started their children early at the EBF.CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that the use of reproductive health services was linked to environmental, economic, cultural and structural factors. Improving the accessibility of these services requires joint action by the government, NGOs, community actors and the involvement of the population. This will be done through the construction, equipping and rehabilitation of health facilities, strengthening the knowledge of providers, community actors, women and support groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→