MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787039764 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04205

Simultaneous Design and Control of Catalytic Distillation Columns Using Comprehensive Rigorous Dynamic Models

2018· article· en· W2787039764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistillationWeightingFractionating columnTrayProcess engineeringComputer scienceProfitability indexColumn (typography)Reactive distillationWork (physics)ChemistryEngineeringChromatographyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work addressed the rigorous modeling of catalytic distillation columns by simultaneously considering relevant phenomena such as pressure drop across the column, tray capacity constraints, nonideal behavior of both liquid and vapor, and the column’s hydrodynamics, yet to be considered in earlier modeling studies for catalytic distillation. The developed model is applied for the simultaneous optimal design and control of catalytic distillation units, taking into account economic and set-point tracking objective functions balanced through a proposed weighting parameter estimation methodology. Results for a column for the production of ethyl tert -butyl ether show the advantages of a more comprehensive model regarding design and control decisions in comparison with previous studies: design specifications were met during the entire time horizon without sacrificing economic profitability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it