MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787116350 · doi:10.1055/s-0043-123931

How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)

2018· review· en· W2787116350 on OpenAlexaff
Christoph F. Dietrich, Michalakis A. Averkiou, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, R. Graham Barr, Peter N. Burns, Fabrizio Calliada, Vito Cantisani, Byung Ihn Choi, Maria Cristina Chammas, Dirk‐André Clevert, M. Claudon, Jean-Michel Corréas, Xin‐Wu Cui, David O. Cosgrove, Mirko D’Onofrio, Yi Dong, JohnR. Eisenbrey, Teresa Fontanilla, Odd Helge Gilja, A Ignee, Christian Jenssen, Yuko Kono, Masatoshi Kudo, Nathalie Lassau, Andrej Lyshchik, Maria Franca Meloni, Fuminori Moriyasu, Christian Nolsøe, Fabio Piscaglia, Maija Radziņa, Adrian Săftoiu, Paul S. Sidhu, Ioan Sporea, Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich, Claude B. Sirlin, Maria Stanczak, Hans-Peter Weskott, Stephanie R. Wilson, Jürgen K. Willmann, Tae Kim, Hyun‐Jung Jang, Alexandar Vezeridis, Sue Westerway

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound International Open · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContrast-enhanced ultrasoundUltrasoundMedical diagnosisMedical physicsMedicineContrast (vision)RadiologyUltrasonographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"How to perform contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)" provides general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) for clinical decision-making and reviews technical parameters for optimal CEUS performance. CEUS techniques vary between centers, therefore, experts from EFSUMB, WFUMB and from the CEUS LI-RADS working group created a discussion forum to standardize the CEUS examination technique according to published evidence and best personal experience. The goal is to standardise the use and administration of UCAs to facilitate correct diagnoses and ultimately to improve the management and outcomes of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations365
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound International OpenSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207