Du <i>dix-neuf au nineteen</i>. Une étude comparative des versions québécoise francophone et canadienne anglophone de la série télévisée <i>19-2</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a comparative analysis of the award-winning Quebec police television drama 19-2 (Ici Radio-Canada Télé, 2011–2015) and its English Canadian adaptation (Bravo, 2014–). This case study gives us a rare opportunity to examine the process of TV adaptation in Canada. The English version of 19-2 has obviously been designed to be “faithful,” in many respects, to the original: the story and narrative arcs are quite similar; many characters still bear the name of their French predecessors; the formal features and narrative conventions of the series have mostly been reproduced. However, through the analysis of a few pivotal scenes and narrative arcs, we will argue that these productions, conceived as distinct “performances” of the same story or “format,” differ significantly in terms of gender politics—their narrative construction of televised masculinities, their negotiation of hegemonic and ideal identity models, and their representation of gender relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".