MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787150389 · doi:10.1109/epec.2017.8286143

An energy management approach for electric vehicle fast charging station

2017· article· en· W2787150389 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yuchong Huo, François Bouffard, G. Joós

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationCharging stationState of chargePhotovoltaic systemElectric vehicleComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Energy managementFlexibility (engineering)Automotive engineeringBattery (electricity)Real-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringEnergy (signal processing)ElectricityOperations managementPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Quebec government is boosting transportation electrification in their fight against climate change. An extensive network of fast charging stations is indispensable for the proliferation of electric vehicle (EV), as it provides a way to charge an EV in a short time. This paper focuses on operational planning and energy management in a fast charging station. First the statistical characteristics of charging demand and the forecast error of embedded station photovoltaic generation are modelled. An energy scheduling strategy of fast charging station is then developed based on the concept of flexibility envelope. In the proposed strategy, the parameters of flexibility requirements are adjusted according to the state of charge of station battery. The performance of the strategy is then evaluated in terms of the stations daily financial performance and customers' waiting time. Using these performance metrics, a set of case studies are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207