MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787164094 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2017.8274521

Digital image expert system for corrosion analysis of steel transmission structures

2017· article· en· W2787164094 on OpenAlexaff
Ibrahim Hathout, Karen Callery, Tariq Hathout, Ugan Sivagnanenthirarajah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster UniversityHydro One (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRGB color modelPixelShadow (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceCorrosionComputer visionDigital imageTransmission (telecommunications)Artificial neural networkImage (mathematics)Image processingMaterials scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Corrosion Management Expert System (CMES) was developed to improve inspection and damage assessment of existing steel transmission structures. CMES analyzes digital images of the corroded steel towers to classify corrosion type and severity. By employing an artificial neural network and RGB color model, CMES classifies pixels into a set of predefined colors. Since RGB is an additive color model, it is sensitive to environmental effects such as sunlight, shadows, etc., which will alter the red, green, and blue pixel values and may adversely affect the CMES's ability to accurately recognize the true pixel color and the image. For example, if a shadow covers part of the image, the system will identify the dark, shadowed areas as corroded spots. To improve the system's accuracy and pattern recognition capabilities, a shadow removal algorithm must be integrated with CMES. In this paper, two algorithms are compared for integration with CMES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207