Female Transcendence: Approaching the "Experiénce Extrême" in Contemporary French Horror Cinema
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The horror genre has not historically been popular amongst critics, scholars, and feminist writers, and is often criticized for sensationalizing physical and sexual violence against the female form.Building off the preexisting literature on the problematic representation of gender in horror, this thesis looks at a number of New French Extremity films that assault audiences with unrelenting scenes of violence, torture, rape, cannibalism, and self-mutilation, which are performed almost exclusively upon or by women.That being said, although the films of the New French Extremity have been dismissed as excessive and exploitative, this thesis argues for the feminist potential of these texts through their treatment of the female body as the site and agent of what French literary figure Georges Bataille calls the "expérience extrême".Through a close analysis of the films Inside (Bustillo and Maury, 2007), Martyrs (Laugier, 2008), Trouble Every Day (Denis, 2001), and In My Skin (de Van, 2002) this thesis will examine how women are presented as the sites and agents of the expérience extrême, arguing that this embodiment of Bataille's concept contributes to feminist narratives that challenge traditional notions of female victimhood in the controversial genre.Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………..ii Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………...iii Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter 1: Existing Boundaries: Sexual Difference in the Horror Film and Georges Bataille……………………………………………………………………………….13 Chapter 2: Breaking Boundaries: Inside and Martyrs as Metaphors for the Undoing of Patriarchy…………………………………………………………………………….
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".