Algebraic construction of quasi-split algebraic tori
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of this work is to give a constructive proof for a particular case of the no-name lemma. Let [Formula: see text] be a finite group, [Formula: see text] a field that is equipped with a faithful [Formula: see text]-action, and [Formula: see text] a sign permutation [Formula: see text]-lattice (see the Introduction for the definition). Then [Formula: see text] acts naturally on the group algebra [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] over [Formula: see text], and hence also on the quotient field [Formula: see text]. A well-known variant of the no-name lemma asserts that the invariant sub-field [Formula: see text] is a purely transcendental extension of [Formula: see text]. In other words, there exist [Formula: see text] which are algebraically independent over [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we give an explicit construction of suitable elements [Formula: see text].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".