MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787205851 · doi:10.1353/ajh.2018.0013

Neither in Dark Speeches Nor in Similitudes: Reflections and Refractions Between Canadian and American Jews ed. by Barry L. Stiefel and Hernan Tesler-Mabé

2018· article· en· W2787205851 on OpenAlex
Joshua J. Furman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Jewish history · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish Identity and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismHistoryTheme (computing)ConversationReligious studiesGenealogySociologyTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Neither in Dark Speeches Nor in Similitudes: Reflections and Refractions Between Canadian and American Jews ed. by Barry L. Stiefel and Hernan Tesler-Mabé Joshua Furman (bio) Neither in Dark Speeches Nor in Similitudes: Reflections and Refractions Between Canadian and American Jews. Edited by Barry L. Stiefel and Hernan Tesler-Mabé. Ontario: Wilfried Laurier University Press, 2016. xxiii + 223 pp. "How different are Canadian Jews from the Jews of the United States?" ask Barry Stiefel and Hernan Tesler-Mabé, editors of a volume of essays about relationships and comparisons between the communities divided by the world's longest international border (xi). Stiefel and Tesler-Mabé urge us to look beyond these boundaries that too often obscure the manner in which Jews actually lived, place limits on the questions that scholars ask about North American Jewish life, and prevent us from examining assumptions about exceptionalism and singularity. As a transnational study, Neither in Dark Speeches Nor in Similitudes joins an ongoing conversation in the field of Jewish history. As Stiefel and Tesler-Mabé point out, however, despite the flowering of transnational analysis in recent decades, no systematic comparative work has been done on the Jews of the United States and Canada since Moses Rischin's 1987 [End Page 168] volume The Jews of North America. Their effort to bridge this gap, a collection of essays by American and Canadian scholars, would benefit from a stronger thematic focus instead of the chronological approach it adopts. I would also argue that frequent references in the book to "North American Jewry" and "North American Jewish studies" are problematic in a work that elides the Jews of Mexico altogether. Nevertheless, the editors are to be commended for reviving a field of study that has lain dormant for too long. The essays explore two dimensions of the relationship between Canadian and American Jews. On one level, we learn about the extent of ties in the realm of lived experience. Traversing the 49th parallel, Jews on either side of the border befriended and married each other, collaborated together on projects of religious and cultural significance, and relied on each other for economic opportunity and spiritual leadership. Lillooet Nördlinger McDonnell examines close connections between Jews in mid-nineteenth-century San Francisco and Victoria, British Columbia. As she demonstrates, Jews north of the border regularly returned to San Francisco to visit family and conduct business, and the first Torah scrolls came to Victoria from San Francisco's Temple Emanu-El. Focused on the same era, Zev Eleff analyzes the cooperative effort of Abraham De Sola, spiritual leader of Montreal's Sephardic congregation, and Jacques Judah Lyons, minister of New York's Shearith Israel, to produce a traditional Jewish calendar that pushed back against the tide of religious reform. On another level, many of the essays compare and contrast facets of American and Canadian Jewish life, bringing similarities and differences to the fore. In order to explain why the Jews of Quebec's first synagogue composed their bylaws only in English, whereas the Jews of another North American francophone community, New Orleans, wrote the bylaws of their first synagogue in both English and French, Barry Stiefel offers a series of well-reasoned historical explanations. The earliest Jews in Quebec, who worked for or supported the conquering British Army, had family and business ties to British Jewry, and eagerly sought to align themselves with the ruling class of anglophone elites, had no interest in making their synagogue bylaws comprehensible to the Québécois. Catholic antisemitism also loomed large in shaping resentment toward Jews among French Canadians. The Jews of New Orleans, by way of contrast, lived in a territory that was acquired peacefully and was characterized by a more laissez-faire approach to religious difference. Therefore, Stiefel argues, "[h]aving a French copy of Shaarei Chessed's bylaws showed that the Jewish community was a welcoming member of Louisiana's pluralistic society" (36). [End Page 169] Examining American and Canadian Jews together allows us to see how demographics, politics, markets, and culture shape the lives of individuals and communities in ways both similar and different. The aforementioned Jews of McDonnell's Victoria, we learn, were well integrated...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it