Fast and robust visual egomotion estimation via stereo vision for indoor hand-held and wearable localization/tracking applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A fast and robust algorithm for motion estimation based on stereo vision is proposed. The algorithm consists of two consecutive stages. First, interest points are found and tracked between four images from two consecutive time steps. A novel robust method for tracking features is proposed for this step to address shortcomings of the traditional methods for indoor hand-held/wearable scenarios. Next, motion of the camera in time is estimated via optimizing the total reprojection error associated with the robust features found using the first stage. A key assumption is that motion between the two time steps is sufficiently small or equivalently, the frames are captured close enough in time. The proposed Visual Ego-motion Estimation (VEE), is robust due to robust feature tracking in the first step, and fast due to efficient reprojection error minimization used to estimate the six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) motion of the camera. Experiments prove comparable/superior results compared to the state-of-the-art methods in the literature especially for indoor handheld scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".