MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787312823 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b02739

Two-Dimensional Phosphorus-Doped Carbon Nanosheets with Tunable Porosity for Oxygen Reactions in Zinc-Air Batteries

2018· article· en· W2787312823 on OpenAlexafffund
Wen Lei, Ya‐Ping Deng, Gaoran Li, Zachary P. Cano, Xiaolei Wang, Dan Luo, Yangshuai Liu, Deli Wang, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersWaterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of WaterlooChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of WaterlooNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceCatalysisCarbon fibersPhosphorus pentoxideChemical engineeringMesoporous materialOxygen evolutionPorosityZincBattery (electricity)DopingElectrocatalystInorganic chemistryPhosphorusCathodeNanotechnologyElectrodeChemistryElectrochemistryMetallurgyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-sized two-dimensional phosphorus-doped carbon nanosheets (2D-PPCN) with tunable porosity were synthesized via a multifunctional templating method. A single inexpensive solid precursor, phosphorus pentoxide, is combined with common saccharides in a stepwise multiple templating process for 2D construction, phosphorus doping, and regulated micro-/mesopore creation. This reliable 2D porous carbon production technique can potentially be utilized in a variety of energy storage and conversion fields. The effects of different porous structures on the electrocatalytic activity of 2D-PPCN based electrocatalysts are specifically investigated in this work. The interconnected open-pore system and high specific surface area result in a high catalytic efficiency for both the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). When integrated into an air-breathing cathode for rechargeable Zn-air batteries, the best-performing 2D-PPCN demonstrates better cell performance than a noble metal benchmark catalyst and a higher durability with over 1000 charge–discharge cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations199
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207