MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787319262

The Effects of Salinity and Activated Charcoal on the Herbivory of Arabidopsis thaliana by Myzus persicae

2017· article· en· W2787319262 on OpenAlexaff
Sommer Chou, Alexi Doan, Helena Koniar, Bryce Norman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyzus persicaeCharcoalActivated charcoalSalinityAphidBiocharHerbivoreHorticultureBiologyBotanyAgronomyActivated carbonChemistryEcologyPyrolysisAdsorption
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road salt is commonly applied in the winter and inevitably percolates into surrounding areas where it is absorbed by plants. The detrimental effects of salinity on plants has been studied extensively, with recent research papers investigating potential mitigative methods, including the application of biochar. Building upon previous findings, this study serves to explore the use of activated carbon, charcoal with increased adsorptive ability, as a remediation technique for salt stress. Using Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress) and Myzus persicae (green peach aphids) as our model organisms, the aim was to determine the individual and combined effects of salinity and activated charcoal on plant performance and aphid populations using a factorial design. The overall findings presented a statistically significant effect (p=0.0201) on M. persicae herbivory between 25 mM salt and activated charcoal treatment groups. Although changes in plant biomass were not observed, there were a greater number of aphids occupying the plants without activated charcoal than on plants with activated charcoal for 25 mM salt treatments. Therefore, activated charcoal presents the opportunity for an accessible method of treatment for salt-stressed plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207