MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

APLIKASI PERAMALAN JUMLAH KELAHIRAN DENGAN METODE JARINGAN SYARAF TIRUAN

2018· article· en· W2787356029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indonesian Journal of Public Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkStatisticStatisticsPreprocessorComputer scienceData pre-processingArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The forecast is a statistic analysis to predict what it will happen in the future using the data and information from the past. This research aimed to apply Artificial Neural Network method for estimate the f ertility rate in Surabaya. The study was descriptive which using secondary data providing from Dinas Kesehatan Kota Surabaya. The study used time series data by recapitulation of fertility rate monthly from 2012-2016. The data analysis used R Program. The result showed the best estimator model for Artificial Neural Network method was 1-3-1 architecture with preprocessing normalized. RMS value of Artificial Neural Network method was 338.1551. The conclusion of this research was the Artificial Neural Network method for estimate the f ertility rate in Surabaya could be used for planning birth control program especially Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it