MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787393148 · doi:10.1090/conm/721/14498

Symmetrization of Jordan dialgebras

2019· preprint· en· W2787393148 on OpenAlexafffund
Murray R. Bremner

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical Society · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSymmetrizationMathematicsConstructiveClass (philosophy)Commutative propertyPolynomialDegree (music)Identity (music)Product (mathematics)Algebra over a fieldSkewSemidirect productPure mathematicsCombinatoricsGroup (periodic table)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A basic problem for any class of nonassociative algebras is to determine the polynomial identities satisfied by the symmetrization and the skew-symmetrization of the original product. We consider the symmetrization of the product in the class of special Jordan dialgebras. We use computational linear algebra to show that every polynomial identity of degree <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="n less-than-or-equal-to 5"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ≤ </mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">n \le 5</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> satisfied by the symmetrized Jordan diproduct in every diassociative algebra is a consequence of commutativity. We determine a complete set of generators for the polynomial identities in degree 6 which are not consequences of commutativity. We use a constructive version of the representation theory of the symmetric group to show that there exist further new identities in degree 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary mathematics - American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topics in AlgebraFrench-language works237,207