MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787455804 · doi:10.17118/11143/11876

La protection de l'information génétique dans le domaine médical au Québec : principe général de confidentialité et questions soulevées par les dispositions d'exception

2006· article· fr· W2787455804 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Emmanuelle Lévesque, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Denis Avard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit Université de Sherbrooke · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalGenome CanadaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article a été rendu possible grâce au financement des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (projet Écogène), de Génome Québec et de Génome Canada.Les auteurs remercient Me Yann Joly, Me Mireille Lacroix et Mme Clémentine Sallée pour leurs précieux commentaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.027
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit Université de SherbrookeSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207