MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787711429 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2017.8288344

PQuery: Achieving Privacy-Preserving Query with Communication Efficiency in Internet of Things

2017· article· en· W2787711429 on OpenAlexaff
Nafiseh Izadi Yekta, Rongxing Lu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInternet of ThingsScheme (mathematics)Service providerInformation privacyPrivate information retrievalComputer securityService (business)The InternetPrivacy protectionComputer networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT), as it can provide many promising IoT services to end users, has received considerable attention in recent years. However, IoT's security and privacy are still challenging today. In this paper, we propose a privacy- preserving query scheme, called PQuery, for fog computing-enhanced IoT. The proposed PQuery scheme is characterized by employing two privacy enhancing techniques, i.e., private information retrieval and oblivious transfer, to preserve the privacy for both the end user and the service provider in IoT query service. Though the computational cost is still high at the fog device, the communication overheads in PQuery can be greatly reduced between the fog device and the end user.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207