MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787810440 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2017.8287904

A Distributed Approach to Improving EPC Controller Performance

2017· article· en· W2787810440 on OpenAlexafffund
Modhawi Alotaibi, Amiya Nayak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHandoverComputer scienceScalabilityComputer networkController (irrigation)Software-defined networkingDistributed computingArchitectureEmbedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A software-defined network paradigm has been recently proposed as a solution to tackle several issues in legacy networking, specifically, in cellular networks. In cellular networks such as LTE, SDN has been incorporated into different parts, especially into the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). The current SDN-based centralized EPC controller architecture for the cellular network displays weaknesses on handover efficiency and scalability. In this paper, we present a distributed approach for implementing EPC controller architecture that utilizes functional entities to handle handover procedures asynchronously in order to improve system efficiency and scalability. Moreover, we carried out a comparative analysis of current centralized EPC controller architecture and our proposed distributed EPC controller architecture. The simulation results quantify the advantages of the distributed EPC controller architecture over centralized EPC controller architecture in terms of handover latency and average throughput per user. We demonstrate that the proposed architecture offers better performance on handover and data transmission in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207