MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787819890 · doi:10.1109/crv.2017.39

Ready—Aim—Fly! Hands-Free Face-Based HRI for 3D Trajectory Control of UAVs

2017· article· en· W2787819890 on OpenAlexafffund
Jake Bruce, Jacob Michael Perron, Richard Vaughan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrajectoryFace (sociological concept)Computer scienceComputer visionOn the flyArtificial intelligenceHands freeHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel user interface for aiming andlaunching flying robots on user-defined trajectories. The methodrequires no user instrumentation and is easy to learn by analogyto a slingshot. With a few minutes of practice users can sendrobots along a desired 3D trajectory and place them in 3D space, including at high altitude and beyond line-of-sight. With the robot hovering in front of the user, the robot tracksthe user's face to estimate its relative pose. The azimuth, elevationand distance of this pose control the parameters of the robot'ssubsequent trajectory. The user triggers the robot to fly thetrajectory by making a distinct pre-trained facial expression. Wepropose three different trajectory types for different applications:straight-line, parabola, and circling. We also describe a simple training/startup interaction to selecta trajectory type and train the aiming and triggering faces. Inreal-world experiments we demonstrate and evaluate the method. We also show that the face-recognition system is resistant to inputfrom unauthorized users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207