Flood Extent Mapping from Time-Series SAR Images Based on Texture Analysis and Data Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, satellite images are considered as one of the most relevant sources of information in the context of major disasters management. Their availability in extreme weather conditions and their ability to cover wide geographic areas make them an indispensable tool toward an effective disaster response. Among the various available sensors, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is distinguished in the context of flood management by its ability to penetrate cloud cover and its robustness to unfavourable weather conditions. This work aims at developing a new technique for flooded areas extraction from high resolution time-series SAR images. The proposed approach is mainly based on three steps: first, homogeneous regions characterizing water surfaces are extracted from each SAR image using a local texture descriptor. Then, mathematical morphology is applied to filter tiny artifacts and small homogeneous areas present in the image. And finally, spatial and radiometric information embedded in each pixel are extracted and are fused with the same pixel information but from another image to decide if the current pixel belongs to a flooded region. In order to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm, our methodology was applied to time-series images acquired before and during three different flooding events: (1) Richelieu River and lake Champlain floods, Quebec, Canada in 2011; (2) Evros River floods, Greece in 2014 and (3) Western and southwestern of Iran floods in 2016. Experiments show that our approach gives very promising results compared to existing techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".