Mesoscopic study of miscible nanoflow instabilities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanofluids have recently been introduced as a remedy to control flow instability. The complex behavior of nanoparticles under different hydrodynamic and thermodynamic conditions makes the modeling and predictions of the process complicated, and such an erratic nature entails the carefully scrutinized analysis of hydrodynamic movement and deposition of nanoparticles. In this study, the effects of nanoparticles on instability are examined using the lattice Boltzmann approach. The flow geometry is a porous medium consisting of regularly arranged disks, and the adopted mesoscopic model accounts for heat transfer effects as well as nanoparticle deposition. A new probabilistic model has been proposed for particle deposition to better predict the behavior of nanoparticles. It is shown that nanoparticles behave differently at various viscous regimes and the instability is controlled by physical and chemical properties of the nanoparticles. The study also reveals some interesting behavior of nanoparticles at different sizes and surface potentials which directly affect the instability. Furthermore, thermal induced instabilities show how nanoparticles behave differently at various temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it