Human Rights, Information, and Communication Technology (ICT): A Case Study of Art Education Teacher Candidates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Case study research on human rights education is addressed within the context of a pre-service course entitled, digiART and Human Rights: A New Media, Arts Integrated Project. The research was conducted during the fall-winter 2011/2012. The authors drew upon work during a previous 2011 Faculty of Education Summer Graduate Institute and incorporated these concepts into developing meaningful curricula using contemporary technologies. Following Tibbitts (2002) Human Rights Education Paradigm of the (1) values/awareness model (2) accountability model and (3) transformational model investigators found that models 1 and 3 served to enlighten teacher candidates' approaches to teaching human rights issues in which they incorporated ICT. New media processes during the preproduction to postproduction are described. This case study has potential for broader applicability across disciplines and provides incentive for a renewed dialogue about the value of visual arts and art education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it