Vertical migration patterns of the different larval instars of <i>Chaoborus flavicans</i> and the influence of dissolved oxygen concentrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we investigate the diel vertical migration (DVM) of the different larval stages of Chaoborus flavicans between spring and summer in two different lakes and three different years. Specific attention is given to the influence of the vertical distribution of dissolved oxygen (DO) on the DVM of the different larval instars. To our knowledge, this study is the first that combines continuous observations of DVM of C. flavicans with continuous measurements of DO distributions over several months, allowing the assessment of changes in DVM due to the development of hyperoxic conditions in the deep water of lakes. With ontogenetic development, C. flavicans larvae increase their sensitivity to changes in light intensity and their tolerance to low oxygen conditions. Our results suggest that the physiological changes of C. flavicans larvae are adaptations to seasonal changes in DO, improving migration abilities to enable utilization of hypoxic and anoxic waters to avoid predation. Interannual change in the abundance and vertical distribution of phytoplankton affecting DO concentrations was sufficient to alter DVM patterns of C. flavicans larvae between years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".