Voies | Voix autistes franco-ontariennes : quand la reconnaissance de la neurodiversité devient-elle une voie émancipatrice militante?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article tire son origine d’une étude exploratoire menée avec quatre jeunes et adultes autistes francophones de l’Ontario et réalisée par l’entremise d’un blogue collaboratif nomméVoix autistes franco-ontariennes. Leurs discours détonnent parmi la majorité des écrits sur l’autisme largement focalisés sur les enjeux infantiles, révélant ainsi la stigmatisation de leur triple statut identitaire imbriqué : adulte, autiste, francophone vivant en situation linguistique minoritaire. Rarement citées, leurs voix minoritaires se rallient à celles de milliers d’autres rassemblés au sein d’un militantisme naissant qui revendique que l’autisme soit reconnu comme une variation neurologique plutôt qu’une pathologie. Connue sous le nom de la neurodiversité, cette nouvelle vision militante s’inscrit dans une démarche consciente de réappropriation du droit à l’auto-identification autistique agissant telle une voie émancipatrice des inégalités sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".