MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788248547

Application of Chebyshev polynomials for solving Abel's integral equations of the first and second kind

2018· article· en· W2788248547 on OpenAlexaff
A. Shahsavaran, M. M. Shamivand

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory of Approximation and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsChebyshev polynomialsAlgebraic equationTaylor seriesIntegral equationSingularityNumerical analysisApplied mathematicsGaussian eliminationChebyshev equationMathematical analysisGaussianClassical orthogonal polynomialsNonlinear systemOrthogonal polynomials
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a numerical implementation of an expansion method is developed for solving Abel's integral equations of the first and second kind. The solution of such equations may demonstrate a singular behaviour in the neighbourhood of the initial point of the interval ofintegration. The suggested method is based on the use of Taylor series expansion to overcome the singularity which leads to approximating the unknown function and it's derivatives in terms of Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. The proposed method, transforms the Abel's integral equations of the first and second kind into a system of linear algebraic equations which can be solved by Gaussian elimination algorithm. Finally, some numerical examples are included to clarify the accuracy and applicability of the presented method which indicate that proposed method is computationally very attractive. In thispaper, all numerical computations were carried out on a PC executing some programs written in maple software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory of Approximation and ApplicationsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207