Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe article analyzes the construction of the hero in O guarani (1857) and silver (1865-66), both by Jose de Alencar, starting from the studies that the Canadian critic Northrop Frye (2004, 2006, 2014) wrote on the romantic fictional mode. Although The silver mines brings historical data and the building of characters in reference to the first one, the way its hero, Estacio, behaves in relation to the intrigue suggests an acute understanding, on the part of Alencar, of the historical background similar to that held in Walter Scott´s Waverley (1814). portuguesO artigo procura analisar a construcao da figura do heroi em O guarani (1857) e minas de (1865-1866), de Jose de Alencar, partindo dos estudos que o critico canadense Northrop Frye (2004, 2006, 2014) realizou sobre o modo ficcional romanesco. Embora As minas de prata traga dados historicos e de construcao de personagens que remetem ao primeiro, a maneira como seu heroi, Estacio, se comporta em relacao a intriga sugere uma compreensao aguda, da parte do escritor cearense, do pano de fundo historico empreitada similar a que Walter Scott realizou em Waverley (1814).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".