MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788376296 · doi:10.3846/mma.2018.001

An Arc Search Interior-Point Algorithm for Monotone Linear Complementarity Problems over Symmetric Cones

2018· article· en· W2788376296 on OpenAlexaff
M. Pirhaji, M. Zangiabadi, H. Mansouri, Saman Hassanzadeh Amin

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterior point methodMathematicsMonotone polygonArc (geometry)Complementarity (molecular biology)Linear complementarity problemEllipseEllipsoidAlgorithmConvergence (economics)Point (geometry)Path (computing)Search algorithmMathematical optimizationCombinatoricsGeometryComputer scienceNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An arc search interior-point algorithm for monotone symmetric cone linear complementarity problem is presented. The algorithm estimates the central path by an ellipse and follows an ellipsoidal approximation of the central path to reach an "-approximate solution of the problem in a wide neighborhood of the central path. The convergence analysis of the algorithm is derived. Furthermore, we prove that the algorithm has the complexity bound O ( p rL) using Nesterov-Todd search direction and O (rL) by the xs and sx search directions. The obtained iteration complexities coincide with the best-known ones obtained by any proposed interior- point algorithm for this class of mathematical problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207