Ecotourism and Sustainable Rural Development in Pérez Zeledón, Costa Rica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the contributions of ecotourism to sustainable community development in a predominately rural area of Costa Rica’s southern interior, away from the country’s more concentrated touristic regions. An ethnographic case study was undertaken in the village of San Gerardo de Rivas, the entry point for tourists who climb Costa Rica’s highest peak. Here, tourism has become a complementary source of income to agriculture. Drawing on local perspectives, an understanding emerges of how this industry has shaped environmental perspectives and practices, as well as how local people are negotiating the direction of tourism development to optimize the benefits to their community. The potential opportunities and limitations for further ecotourism industries in Perez Zeledon are also explored, along with an assessment of other sustainable rural development options. Keywords: ecotourism; rural livelihoods; sustainable development; environmental practices; local perspectives. -------------------------------------------------------- Resume Cet article explore les contributions de l'ecotourisme au developpement durable des communautes dans une zone principalement rurale du centre sud du Costa Rica, loin des regions denses en tourisme du pays. Un cas d'etude ethnographique a ete entrepris dans le village de San Gerardo de Rivas, le point d'entree pour les touristes qui escaladent le plus haut sommet du Costa Rica. Ici, le tourisme est devenu une source complementaire de revenu dans l'agriculture. D'apres les perspectives locales, une comprehension emerge sur la maniere dont l'industrie a faconne les perspectives et les pratiques environnementales, ainsi que la maniere dont les personnes locales negocient la direction du developpement du tourisme pour optimiser les benefices de leur communaute. Les opportunites potentielles et les limites d'avoir plus d' industries d'ecotourisme a Perez Zeledon sont aussi explorees, en meme temps qu'une evaluation d'autres options de developpement durable en milieu rural.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".