MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788587956 · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01574

Selective Inhibitors of Human Neuraminidase 3

2018· article· en· W2788587956 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianlin Guo, Philipp Dätwyler, Е. П. Демина, Michele R. Richards, Peng Ge, Chunxia Zou, Ruixiang Blake Zheng, Anne Fougerat, Alexey V. Pshezhetsky, Beat Ernst, Christopher W. Cairo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Glycomics CentreUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Glycomics NetworkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryNeuraminidaseIsozymeIn vitroSmall moleculeBiochemistrySelectivityEnzymeSialic acidStructure–activity relationshipCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human neuraminidases (NEU) are associated with human diseases including cancer, atherosclerosis, and diabetes. To obtain small molecule inhibitors as research tools for the study of their biological functions, we designed a library of 2-deoxy-2,3-didehydro- N -acetylneuraminic acid (DANA) analogues with modifications at C4 and C9 positions. This library allowed us to discover selective inhibitors targeting the human NEU3 isoenzyme. Our most selective inhibitor for NEU3 has a K i of 320 ± 40 nM and a 15-fold selectivity over other human neuraminidase isoenzymes. This inhibitor blocks glycolipid processing by NEU3 in vitro. To improve their pharmacokinetic properties, various esters of the best inhibitors were synthesized and evaluated. Finally, we confirmed that our best compounds exhibited selective inhibition of NEU orthologues from murine brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal ChemistrySame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207