MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788646969

An overview of twenty years of research at the Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Canada on fuel moisture estimation using optical, thermal infrared and radar remote sensing in boreal forests in Alberta, the Northwest Territories, and Alaska.

2017· article· en· W2788646969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brigitte Leblon, Guy Strickland, Steven Oldford, Keith N. Abbott, Laura Bourgeau‐Chavez, Joseph R. Buckley, Gordon Staples, M E Akexander, Mike Flannigan

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceForestryRadarMeteorologyGeographyEngineeringTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an overview of 20 years of research at the Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Canada, on fuel moisture estimation using optical, thermal infrared and radar remote sensing in the boreal forests of Alberta, the Northwest Territories, and Alaska. In collaboration with Canadian Forest Service (CFS), the first studies tested the use of NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and surface temperature images over the boreal forests of the Northwest Territories and Alberta. Over the boreal forests in the Northwest Territories, we observed that mean surface temperature values increased as ignition dates approached and high fire weather index (FWI) areas corresponded to high surface temperature values (Oldford et al. 2003). A modelling approach showed that FWI was related to the ratio between actual and potential evapotranspirations estimated from NOAA-AVHRR images (Strickland et al. 2001). Over boreal forests in Alberta, significant relationships were established between the drought code (DC) and NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and surface temperature images, Satellite-based DC estimations were more reliable than weather station-based DC in the detection of fire starts (Oldford et al. 2006). More recently, SAR images from ERS-1 C-VV (Leblon et al. 2002) and RADSARSAT-1 C-HH (Abbott et al. 2007) were tested over forests in the Northwest Territories for the estimation of fuel moisture codes such as DC and FWI. Relationships with foliar moisture content (FMC) were also established. These studies also showed that biomass and canopy had an influence on the moisture code or FMC estimation. Finally, over a chronosequence of Alaskan boreal black spruce ecosystems (recent burns, regenerating forests dominated by shrubs, open canopied and moderately dense forest cover), RADARSAT-2 and ALOS-PALSAR polarimetric images were tested to assess DC variations (Bourgeau-Chavez et al. 2013a). Several polarimetric variables from a multi-date RADARSAT-2 C-band image sequence that were acquired across a range of soil moisture conditions were used to develop empirical algorithms to estimate volumetric soil moisture maps over the Alaskan boreal test area (Bourgeau-Chavez et al. 2013b). A mean error of 6.7 % between observed and estimated values was achieved through a regression model that used the C-VH backscatter intensity, the maximum of degree of polarization (dmax) and the maximum of the completely unpolarised component (Unpolmax) as independent variables. The model also showed improvement from 27% to 33% in the accuracy of the soil volumetric moisture content retrieval by comparison with a model that used only single polarized C-HH data. By providing information on surface roughness and/or biomass, dmax appeared to be helpful for extracting surface soil moisture from SAR data. So far, only empirical relationships have been established and a more deterministic approach still needs to be developed. The various studies were funded by NSERC. ERS-1/2 images were provided by the European Space Agency, RADARSAT-1 and-2 images were provided by the Canadian Space Agency. ALOS-PALSAR images were provided by the Japanese Space Agency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.027
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University)Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207